essentos

Etiqueta: rail terminals

  • What Types of Clients Use Essentos?

    What Types of Clients Use Essentos?

    Not all transport companies operate the same way. Some manage 600-meter trains, others handle empty containers in rapid in-and-out cycles, and many must coexist with legacy systems, Excel spreadsheets, and manual processes that can no longer keep up. Most share a common issue: They want to digitize their operations without slowing down activity, starting from scratch, or relying on off-the-shelf solutions.

    Essentos addresses this need with a clear proposition: A modular operating system for logistics terminals, capable of adapting to any type of infrastructure, process, or digital maturity. From an intermodal rail terminal to a dry port or an empty container depot, Essentos enables you to digitize the essentials first (Gate, Weighing, Yard, and Analytics) and then evolve without redoing everything.

    This guide outlines all the types of clients who can implement Essentos, explaining their challenges, operational logic, and how our modular approach allows them to move forward without disrupting what already works. It’s designed for terminal managers, operations directors, logistics consultants, and CIOs seeking clarity on what can be done, how, and with what real-world results.

    If your company is looking for a practical, secure, and scalable way to modernize its operations, keep reading. There’s no smoke here, just real cases, clear answers, and a solution already delivering results in Europe and Latin America.

    Intermodal rail terminal

    The train-truck mismatch

    A train arrives with 60 wagons. 180 trucks are waiting. If the manifest doesn’t match reality, the first hook-up is delayed.

    License plates are written down by hand and the VGM is printed on paper. The supervisor checks three different screens and still loses traceability.

    The reach stacker searches for a container that isn’t where the PDF indicated. The line grows. The train driver argues over the radio. Minutes are lost.

    Direct impact on margins

    Each extra minute costs €1.15. A train delayed by 40 minutes adds up to €46 per container in delays and fuel.

    Punctuality KPIs drop from 92% to 78%. The shipping line threatens to divert the service to another ramp.

    The lack of reliable data prevents shift planning. Staff work overtime and labor costs rise by 14%.

    Essentos synchronizes every link

    Gate + SecurePass validates the license plate and booking in 2 s. The truck receives an exact time slot and proceeds to the assigned lane.

    Weighing seals the VGM and sends it to the Operations module without double entry. Operations generates the loading task for the correct railcar.

    Plus displays real-time progress. If the pattern deviates, the system notifies the yard manager and adjusts the queue.

    Real case

    At one terminal, Essentos reduced truck dwell time from 68 min to 41 min. The train completed loading 34 min earlier.

    Location errors dropped from 7% to 0.3%. ROI was achieved in 21 operating days.

    Dry port / inland terminal

    Duplicated processes, lost traceability

    The seaport sends an EDI manifest. The inland terminal prints it to check manually. The error arrives with delay.

    A reefer container shows up without temperature data. The operator searches the email for the order. The customs office closes in 40 min.

    Hidden costs, irritated clients

    Double data entry consumes 2 hours daily from one admin. Customs applies a surcharge for incomplete data.

    The client calls three times to find out where their cargo is. Time is wasted, and trust is lost.

    Clean data from port to port

    Connect translates the EDI into semantic events. Gate verifies and enriches incoming data. Weighing certifies the weight without the driver leaving the truck.

    Plus gives the shipping line real-time access. Customs sees the timeline and releases the cargo without extra inspection.

    Measurable result

    A Latin American inland terminal went from 5 days to 1 hour to reconcile physical vs. document inventory.

    Customs surcharges were eliminated and the shipping line increased volume by 18% in two months.

    Multipurpose port terminal

    Diverse cargo, parallel processes

    Monday: containers. Tuesday: bulk. Wednesday: Ro-Ro. A rigid system forces different spreadsheets for each type.

    The crane operator checks an Excel file; The Ro-Ro team uses radio. No one sees the full picture. Moves are duplicated.

    Operational chaos and hidden cost

    The Ro-Ro vessel waits because the dock is occupied without notice. The container misses its train slot.

    The billing per ton of bulk doesn’t match the scale. 3% of revenue is lost.

    Real modularity, not theoretical

    Gate handles any vehicle. Operations creates specific queues. The cargo profile defines the rules.

    The operator sees a single dashboard. If the mode changes, the system adapts logic without restarting anything.

    Mediterranean port

    Started with Gate and Weighing for containers. In 3 months, it added Ro-Ro and solid bulk without halting operations.

    Today it handles 8 types of cargo through a single digital flow and reduced rehandling by 18%.

    Private industrial terminal

    Production and logistics without dialogue

    A steel mill generates 20 railcars a day. Departure depends on external schedules, but there’s no real visibility.

    The ERP orders the shipment of 1,000 tons, but doesn’t know if the track is clear or if there are trucks for last-mile delivery.

    The weighing is manual, the delivery note is signed on paper, and no one can prove the exact dispatch time.

    Costs and bottlenecks

    The shift halts due to lack of track space. The plant slows down without knowing if the train has left.

    Delays lead to contractual penalties. Carriers switch to other providers.

    Production connected to real logistics

    Essentos connects the plant with the rail yard. Each batch has a digital ID from origin to destination.

    Weighing transmits the load to the railcar. Operations validates track availability. Dispatch adjusts in real time.

    Plus provides time-stamped traceability. The ERP stops guessing. The train doesn’t wait. Neither does the truck.

    Ceramics industry

    Buffer storage dropped 27% thanks to synchronization. Trains always departed within their scheduled window.

    Delay penalties were eliminated. The plant gained 1.8 days/month in logistics capacity.

    Urban multimodal logistics hub

    Congestion, noise, and limited windows

    In urban areas, access is restricted. Deliveries must meet scheduling and emissions regulations.

    An urban terminal receives night trains and dispatches within 4-hour slots. If the truck doesn’t show, the slot is lost.

    Neighbors complain about noise. The operator needs data, not excuses.

    Errors that multiply

    A single booking error delays 20 deliveries. The train returns with cargo. Margin drops by half.

    The authority imposes new limitations. The customer doesn’t return.

    Urban precision and traceability

    Gate assigns exact slots. SecurePass prevents queues. Plus monitors timing.

    Essentos shows who’s coming, with what cargo, when they arrive, and how long they take.

    The system adapts to the environment without losing agility.

    Metropolitan terminal

    Reduced neighbor complaints by 71%. Meets 96% of logistics windows. The authority doubled its licenses.

    Mixed logistics terminal (road + rail)

    Two worlds, zero coordination

    The train arrives. The warehouse isn’t expecting it. The truck leaves. The cargo gets stuck in the middle.

    Yard systems don’t “talk” to the road TMS. The worker fills out Excel sheets.

    Inventory goes out of sync. No one knows if a pallet or an entire container is missing.

    Hidden costs from every disconnection

    4% of the cargo undergoes double handling. Unit cost rises without anyone noticing.

    Multimodal contracts lose efficiency. The customer seeks more agile operators.

    A single thread for the entire operation

    Essentos unifies rail and road. Orders are translated into physical tasks, visible in Plus.

    The operator knows if the truck is arriving, if the train is leaving, and what cargo goes in which mode.

    No duplicate entries. Everything flows from gate to final warehouse.

    3PL logistics

    Synchronized modes and cut idle time by 22%. Increased monthly volume without expanding facilities.

    Empty container depots, logistics activity zones (ZAL), and warehouses connected by rail

    Empty container depots: How to digitalize silent chaos

    Although they’re usually invisible to the end customer, empty container depots are an essential part of the logistics cycle. Here, containers are inspected, repaired, cleaned, and stored until their next assignment. The problem is that many still operate with fully manual processes, paper records, or generic software that doesn’t understand container logic.

    This causes input errors, duplicated exits, conflicts with shipping lines, and an inability to plan available space. As volume grows, so do congestion and conflicts. Operating costs skyrocket, and the client loses visibility over actual inventory.

    Essentos adapts its operational core to these facilities, enabling full control of every movement — gate in and gate out — with digital traceability from the very first step. Operators can record inspections, repairs, or assignments directly from a phone or tablet, while managers access dashboards showing availability, rotation, and occupancy by shipping line or container type.

    Plus, thanks to its modular architecture, automatic weighing or OCR cameras can be integrated without developing new platforms. Everything flows through a single operational system, built so information moves without duplication and without the need to consolidate Excel sheets.

    The result is simple yet powerful: more rotation, fewer errors, total visibility, and reduced repetitive tasks that used to require two people per shift just to manage paper sheets.

    ZAL: Turning fragmentation into connected efficiency

    Logistics Activity Zones (ZAL) bring together warehouses, logistics operators, customs services, and multimodal platforms in the same environment. This coexistence creates opportunities, but also significant challenges: multiple actors, different systems, cross-traffic, and shared infrastructure that must be coordinated efficiently.

    Many operators lose visibility over actual cargo traceability, effective use of access points, or the load status of a convoy located inside the ZAL but outside their direct perimeter. This causes overlaps, conflicting priorities, and growing difficulty in scaling operations frictionlessly.

    Essentos allows specific modules to be deployed in each ZAL area (gate, yard, weighing, analytics), integrating all data into a shared system that remains fully segregated by user or company. Each operator sees only their own scope, while the logistics authority or global manager has a real-time holistic view.

    With its role and permission system, it’s possible to manage from a single instance different operators, internal routes, access points, or time windows — applying differentiated usage rules by customer, sector, or type of cargo.

    In zones where major e-commerce platforms, rail-connected warehouses, and customs services coexist, this coordination becomes critical. Essentos makes the complex traceable, and the shared manageable.

    Rail-connected warehouses: Beyond cross-docking

    More and more companies are locating their logistics centers near rail nodes. This enables high-volume movements with lower emissions and creates strategic connections between industrial supply chains. However, many of these warehouses still depend on flows that aren’t aligned with real rail operations.

    Unplanned arrivals, lack of coordination between warehouse and tracks, or delays in physical validations create bottlenecks that disrupt the entire planning cycle. And the train won’t wait — if it’s not loaded or unloaded on time, it loses its slot.

    Essentos synchronizes warehouse operations with rail cycles, adjusting loading windows, validating weights in real time, and pre-assigning resources before the unit physically arrives. This not only prevents delays — it improves shift efficiency and allows earlier task planning.

    Essentos can also integrate with existing WMS systems, using its API to share status data, validations, or alerts. This means clients don’t need to replace their main software, just connect what matters most to operate better.

    For facilities aiming to become last-mile rail logistics hubs, Essentos acts as the digital bridge between tracks and available inventory — not by replacing anything, but by organizing the flow based on real operational logic.

    A solution for every type of terminal

    No two terminals are alike. But they all share a common goal: do more with less, automate without losing control, and grow without having to rebuild their entire system. In this space, Essentos stands out as a modular TOS solution — robust, realistic, and designed to fit each client without forcing a one-size-fits-all model.

    From a last-mile rail terminal to a regional logistics center connected by train, Essentos enables implementation of the essentials (Gate, Weighing, Yard, Analytics) and evolution toward more complex processes — without slowing down daily operations. It’s a solution with no external dependencies, no vendor lock-in, and full sovereignty over existing systems and data.

    What Essentos delivers is not just software. It’s a mature operational approach, born from closely observing how terminals really work and adapting to their complexity. That’s why you don’t need to change everything to start — just identify the biggest pain point and act there first.

    Today, Essentos is already running in real terminals — not as a pilot, not as a mockup, but as the operational core. And every client has adapted it to their way of working, not the other way around.

    If your terminal seeks visible results in weeks, without blind jumps or hidden costs, Essentos could be your next logical step.

  • Why Do So Many TOS Implementations Fail?

    Why Do So Many TOS Implementations Fail?

    Implementing a Terminal Operating System (TOS) should mark a clear break from paper-based records, unreliable spreadsheets, and gut-driven decisions. In theory, go-live should usher in a new era of real-time visibility, scheduled efficiency, and seamless traceability. Yet, the reality is that too many projects never reach that promised state. The system operates at half capacity, operators use it reluctantly or bypass it altogether, and management sees the return on investment vanish amid delays, budget overruns, and growing frustration.

    This paradox—deploying cutting-edge technology that ends up slowing down operations—doesn’t stem from a flaw in the software itself. It arises from how the system is applied to analog processes that were never redesigned to function within a centralized digital platform. When physical and digital workflows run on separate tracks, the result is a TOS living in its own “perfect data” bubble, while the yard, gate, and weighbridge continue to rely on walkie-talkies to get things done.

    If your terminal is about to go live with a new system, or you’re already using one that fails to deliver on its promises, this article may be the turning point between sticking with “the way it’s always been done” and transforming your operation into a truly profitable logistics engine. We’ll break it down into two key dimensions: The technological (what it integrates and how), and the human-operational (who takes ownership of the tool and why they choose to use—or ignore—it).

    From a Flawless Demo to the Concrete Yard

    During the sales phase, most vendors impress with impeccable simulations: Dashboards breathing KPIs in vibrant colors, drag-and-drop flows that balance containers like a game of Tetris, and predictive alerts that defuse surprises before they happen. The magic ends on the first Monday after go-live. At 6:45 AM, trucks arrive without appointments, customs documents are blurry printouts, and drivers are unfamiliar with the new routine. The weighbridge gets isolated because the industrial network fails during shift change, and the RTG crane that’s supposed to report moves drifts out of Wi-Fi range. Suddenly, that TOS meant to orchestrate thousands of events per hour receives delayed or incomplete data, and like a conductor without a score, it can’t keep tempo.

    The most visible symptom is the dual-system syndrome. The TOS screens show outdated information because real-world events are slow to register, while operations continue via radio or WhatsApp. Staff begins to question the system’s reliability and, as a reflex, brings back “paper just in case.” The investment gets trapped in a loop: the less it’s used, the less value it delivers; the less value is perceived, the less it gets used.

    Five Steps That Push a Project Over the Edge

    • Lack of integration with peripheral systems:A TOS depends on external sources: weighbridges, OCR/LPR portals, RFID crane readers, mobile terminals, gate PLCs, and financial ERPs. Excluding even one of these elements breaks the digital chain at its weakest link. The critical data point (verified weight, validated license plate, or yard position) doesn’t enter in real time, forcing manual input. A delay of seconds turns into minutes when there’s a queue—and into hours when incidents pile up.
    • Generic configuration:Many projects begin with a “one size fits all” setup that favors vendor standardization over local specifics: yards with mixed rail tracks, slots dynamically assigned by train schedules, rail windows based on weekly convoys, or clients demanding customized events for their control towers. A poor process-to-software fit leads users to find workarounds—entering data in the wrong modules, using open comment fields, or registering events outside the system entirely. Each shortcut chips away at the reliability of the master data.
    • Training focused on screens, not flows:A quick workshop that teaches “where to click” might pass an audit, but it won’t change operational habits. Operators learn to reproduce the old process within the interface, adding unnecessary clicks and hardcoding avoidable errors. Without a storyboard that links each step to a tangible benefit (fewer delays, shorter lines, fewer fines), the system is seen as bureaucratic overhead—not as a productivity tool.
    • Lack of internal ownership:When data ownership lies only with external consultants, the terminal loses agility to adjust rules for its evolving needs. Excel-based side lists appear, fallback papers resurface, and the database becomes outdated within weeks. When developers return for an adjustment, they find an unrecognizable setup that demands costly reconfiguration.
    • Big bang approach with no quick wins:Rolling out all modules at once without early success milestones leads to fatigue and skepticism. If long lines persist at the gate after three days, morale drops and leadership pushes to “go back to what worked.” Without a high-impact pilot (such as digitizing the weighbridge in one week), the change narrative collapses and naysayers gain traction.

    The Hidden Cost of a Half-Integrated TOS

    To grasp the scale of the issue, let’s take a conservative example: A terminal handling 120,000 TEUs annually operates with a poorly integrated TOS. At first glance, weighbridges work and container movements are recorded, but 2% of containers are mispositioned each year. That sounds minor—until we translate those figures into equipment hours, labor costs, and penalties:

    • Positioning errors: 2% of 120,000 movements = 2,400 mispositioned containers.
    • Average correction time: 18 minutes per incident → 720 hours of reach stacker and operator time.
    • Machinery + operator hourly cost: €95/h → €68,400/year.
    • Rail delay fines: 1 hour/week × €250/h → €13,000/year.
    • Overtime shifts: 4 operators × 2 hours/week × €28/h → €11,600/year.

    Estimated direct annual loss: €93,000. And this doesn’t include the erosion of customer trust, conflicts with carriers, or the reputational cost that won’t show up in your Excel sheet—but definitely will in your next contract negotiation.

    When Technology Doesn’t Fit: Real-World Cases

    The following cases were audited by Essentos between 2020 and 2024 in intermodal terminals across Spain and Latin America. They illustrate the point where a terminal operating system stops being a promise and starts becoming a problem— when integration, connectivity, or operational culture are misaligned.

    Terminal del Norte – A Modern Gate Trapped Between Two Worlds

    After investing €480,000 in licenses, management launched a gate module with OCR, self check-in kiosks, and SMS notifications. The reality: Only 42% of carriers used appointment booking because the app didn’t support multi-leg routes. Trucks without slots piled up; operators had to create manual records to clear queues, and the TOS flagged inconsistencies that blocked entry. Within three months, peak-hour queues averaged over 70 minutes, manual entries reached 48%, and the terminal paid €2,400 per week in waiting fees to transporters.

    The root problem wasn’t the software, but the lack of process governance: Without upstream document pre-validation, the tech-enabled gate inherited the same chaos as the manual one. Essentos redesigned the flow in 19 days: mandatory booking, dynamic tolerance windows, and proactive alerts to drivers. The outcome: Max queue dropped to 11 minutes and 97% valid OCR reads.

    Dry Port – The Invisible Enemy of Industrial Wi-Fi

    Modernization included rugged tablets for RTGs and reach stackers, but the 5 GHz Wi-Fi network only covered 82% of the yard. Anytime a container was dropped in the southeast corner, the transaction was cached; if the operator forgot to sync manually, the move was lost. Over six months, 6,583 orphaned events accumulated— equivalent to 312 hours of search and €54,000 in repositioning labor.

    The solution wasn’t new tablets, but a low-latency 4G/5G SA mesh network and an Essentos Edge agent that stores and resends data with cryptographic sealing once coverage is restored. Today, 100% of movements are confirmed in under 2.5 seconds—even during partial blackouts.

    Latin American Intermodal – Global Setup, Local Reality

    The vendor applied standard “gate-to-port” billing rules. But actual operations involved 550-meter trains, reverse slot logic, and clients demanding custom pre-rail loading events. Planners ended up exporting orders to Excel, turning the TOS into a static database. The gap between planning and execution reached 22%.

    Essentos revamped the slotting logic, added conditional workflows, and activated a REST API for granular billing with the ERP. In 45 days, Excel was retired and the discrepancy fell to 1.1%.

    The Essentos Method – Step by Step

    Essentos condenses successful implementation into five iterative phases that combine lean logisticsdesign thinking, and applied neuroergonomics to maximize adoption:

    1. Operational pain mapping. Gemba walk dynamics, 360° interviews, and temporary IoT capture to uncover hidden bottlenecks.
    2. Flow design with “guardrails.” Each step is configured with automatic validations; users cannot proceed if traceability or SLAs are compromised.
    3. Minimum viable cell pilot. One shift, one crane, one gate: 14 days tracking hard metrics (TPH, dwell time, OTIF).
    4. Progressive rollout. Coverage doubles weekly until full operations are reached—on average within eight weeks.
    5. Continuous digital Kaizen. Process mining dashboard that detects deviations in real time.

    Tangible and Sustainable ROI

    With Essentos, a standard terminal recovers its investment before month 10 and achieves six-figure annual savings. Collateral benefits (better rail punctuality, lower CO2 emissions from reduced overtime, and increased client retention) extend long-term value.

    • –38% gate queue reduction within the first operational week.
    • +24% crane moves per hour by eliminating dead-time.
    • –4.5 t CO2/month from less truck idling.
    • 99.3% data accuracy, enabling automatic invoicing without manual reconciliation.

    Advanced FAQs

    How does Essentos handle cultural change?What if I already use a TOS from another vendor?

    Next Step: Turn Your TOS into a Competitive Advantage

    If your current tech is slowing you down, Essentos can help you accelerate: Complete core module + quick win + guided adoption. Leave inertia behind and embrace logistics powered by reliable data, agile processes, and measurable ROI.

  • How rail terminals in North America can cut costs and emissions with smart automation and why Essentos is leading the way

    How rail terminals in North America can cut costs and emissions with smart automation and why Essentos is leading the way

    A new era of efficiency and sustainability in rail logistics

    Rail freight is gaining momentum across the United States and Canada as a cleaner, more efficient alternative to long-haul trucking. While the rail network itself is inherently sustainable, many intermodal terminals that support it still rely on outdated, manual systems that limit their true potential.

    Today’s operational challenges — labor shortages, volatile fuel prices, environmental compliance, and supply chain complexity — are pushing terminal operators to look for smarter solutions. And smart doesn’t mean more expensive. On the contrary, automation and digital tools can drastically cut operational costs, reduce emissions, and enhance service quality without massive capital expenditure.

    This article explores how smart terminal operating systems (TOS) like Essentos are driving this transformation across North America. We’ll explain the real cost of inefficiency, the tangible benefits of automation, and why Essentos is the right partner for terminals ready to modernize.

    The high cost of manual inefficiencies

    Legacy processes come with hidden costs. In rail terminals, inefficiencies are often baked into daily operations — from clipboards and phone calls to siloed spreadsheets and delayed communications.

    The result? Delayed trains. Missed service windows. Overworked staff. Underused equipment.

    According to industry studies:

    • A mid-size rail terminal loses up to 15% of its operational capacity due to poor process coordination.
    • Labor-intensive workflows lead to avoidable human error and longer cycle times.
    • Equipment idle time leads to unnecessary fuel consumption and higher maintenance costs.

    These issues create a domino effect that impacts customers, increases emissions, and erodes profitability.

    Why automation is a game-changer for terminals

    Smart automation isn’t about replacing workers. It’s about enabling them to operate faster, smarter, and with fewer errors. A modern TOS can handle thousands of data points per hour — something no human team can match in speed or accuracy.

    Here are some automation benefits for North American rail terminals:

    Automated yard planning: Allocate space based on live train schedules and UTI data.

    Optimized crane movements: Minimize empty moves and reduce crane idle time.

    Digital truck coordination: Route trucks efficiently within the terminal to reduce congestion.

    Real-time status tracking: Provide operators, customers, and authorities with live updates.

    These capabilities help terminals process more volume with the same footprint — and with fewer emissions, thanks to reduced equipment runtime and better energy efficiency.

    Essentos: designed for real-world rail terminals

    Essentos is a new generation of TOS, built specifically for intermodal and rail-focused terminals. Unlike rigid legacy systems, Essentos is modular, cloud-ready, and designed to be implemented without disruption.

    Key features include:

    AI-powered automation: Predictive crane and yard operations based on live traffic, container types, and slot availability.

    Seamless UTI and truck recognition:Use computer vision to automate identification and registration.

    Smart billing and service tracking: Automate financial workflows and eliminate errors in invoicing.

    Compliance-ready architecture: Fully compatible with regulatory requirements in the U.S. and Canada, including digital documentation and emissions reporting.

    Essentos doesn’t just digitize your terminal — it transforms it into a smarter, greener, and more profitable operation.

    Aligning with sustainability goals

    In both the U.S. and Canada, logistics operators face increasing pressure to meet environmental standards. Government targets for carbon reduction are being backed by new regulations and incentives for green infrastructure.

    Essentos supports sustainability by:
    Reducing equipment idle time cutting diesel usage.

    Providing detailed emissions tracking for ESG reporting.

    Improving throughput without additional land or capital equipment.

    Encouraging modal shift by making intermodal freight more competitive with trucking.

    By improving energy and asset efficiency, terminals using Essentos can become a part of a broader shift toward greener freight across North America.

    Faster ROI, lower risk

    One of the biggest misconceptions about automation is cost. Many terminals assume they need a large investment to make a meaningful upgrade. In reality, modular platforms like Essentos allow for gradual implementation — with visible ROI in just months.

    Examples from existing clients:

    30% reduction in operational costs within 12 months.

    60% faster processing times for intermodal units.

    80% fewer billing discrepancies through automated invoicing.

    Essentos provides the tools and support to upgrade operations without disrupting day-to-day activity — so terminals can modernize with confidence.

    The time to act is now

    Delaying digital transformation in terminal operations comes with increasing risks:

    Competitors who automate will offer faster, cheaper service.

    Improve service and speed

    Align with environmental goals

    Unlock new growth without expanding your footprint

    Essentos provides the tools and support to upgrade operations without disrupting day-to-day activity — so terminals can modernize with confidence.

    Let’s move freight smarter, faster, together.